🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that phones and platforms are "taking away our kids' youth". Legislation could be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to approve a bill lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended families to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. While it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a useful foundation," stated one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on strong research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a girl who died after viewing harmful platform posts contends that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for young users," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the regional government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, further nations are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations take a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The body points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide debate continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that states around the world are less and less prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.